The global energy landscape is currently navigating a period of profound volatility, characterized by a precarious tug-of-war between the rapid normalization of Persian Gulf oil supplies and the persistent, shadow-like absence of Chinese demand. While the Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) signed on June 17 between the United States and Iran initially signaled a cooling of geopolitical tensions and a subsequent drop in oil prices, the recent resurgence of military hostilities has introduced a new layer of systemic risk.

As market participants weigh the potential for a full supply recovery against the backdrop of an underperforming Chinese economy, the energy sector remains in a state of high alert. This report explores the evolving dynamics of the crude oil market, the critical role of the Strait of Hormuz, and the growing vulnerability of European natural gas reserves as winter approaches.


Main Facts: The Post-MoU Energy Environment

The primary catalyst for the recent shift in market sentiment was the June 17 agreement between Washington and Tehran. The MoU provided a framework for oil flows to recover at a pace that caught many analysts off-guard. This accelerated supply influx, combined with the continued release of oil from various strategic petroleum reserves, created a "supply-heavy" narrative that exerted immediate downward pressure on global benchmarks.

However, the "normalcy" promised by the deal remains elusive. While volumes have rebounded from the peak of the conflict, they remain significantly dampened compared to pre-war baselines. Currently, oil flows through the Persian Gulf hover around 14 million barrels per day (b/d)—a notable recovery from war-time lows, but still far beneath the 20 million b/d threshold that characterized global markets prior to the hostilities.

The current market environment is defined by three conflicting pillars:

  1. Supply Recovery: The faster-than-expected integration of Iranian and Persian Gulf barrels.
  2. Geopolitical Instability: The sudden re-escalation of military tensions, which threatens the safe passage of tankers through the Strait of Hormuz.
  3. Demand Destruction: The sustained, anomalous absence of Chinese crude imports, which have historically served as the engine of global demand growth.

Chronology of Escalation and Market Response

To understand the current volatility, one must trace the timeline of the recent energy fluctuations:

  • Mid-June (June 17): The signing of the US-Iran MoU triggers a sharp decline in oil prices. Markets anticipate a swift, orderly normalization of supply chains.
  • Late June to Early July: The market experiences an "overhang" of tankers stranded in the Persian Gulf as logistics struggle to adjust to the rapid shift in diplomatic status.
  • Mid-July: A series of military escalations occur in the region. Transit through the Strait of Hormuz remains well below pre-war levels, and the security of shipping lanes is once again called into question.
  • Current Status: The market is oscillating between optimism regarding supply normalization and extreme caution driven by the possibility of renewed maritime blockades or strikes.

Supporting Data: Supply and Demand Metrics

The statistical reality of the current energy market reveals a deep structural imbalance. According to recent data from ING Research and international trade monitors, the divergence between supply and demand is striking.

The Persian Gulf Supply Gap

While the recovery of flows is underway, the Strait of Hormuz remains a bottleneck. Pre-war, the waterway acted as the primary artery for 20 million b/d. Today, even with the recent surge in activity, volumes are struggling to maintain a 14 million b/d average. The logistical risk is compounded by the fact that insurance premiums for vessels in the region remain elevated, effectively discouraging a full return to normal shipping volumes.

The China Factor: A 30% Decline

The most significant headwind for oil prices is the contraction of Chinese demand. Historically the world’s largest importer, China has effectively retreated from the global market. In May, crude imports were down 30% year-on-year, with June tracking data indicating an even steeper decline. Domestic demand in China is estimated to have fallen by approximately 1.4 million b/d in the second quarter of 2026. Unless the Chinese government’s efforts to relax export restrictions on refined products lead to a sustained increase in refinery run rates, this demand vacuum will continue to act as a anchor on oil prices.


Revised Forecasts and Economic Implications

The combination of these factors has forced a major recalibration of price expectations. Our revised outlook for ICE Brent reflects a more bearish sentiment for the medium term, predicated on the hope that supply lines remain open, despite the recent flare-ups.

  • 3Q 2026 Forecast: $80/bbl (Average)
  • 4Q 2026 Forecast: $74/bbl (Average)
  • 2027 Forecast: $70/bbl (Average)

However, these figures represent a "base case." If the geopolitical situation in the Persian Gulf continues to deteriorate, or if the Strait of Hormuz faces a sustained blockade, we anticipate that the market could deviate significantly. In a more aggressive, high-stress scenario, it is entirely plausible that Brent crude could test the $100/bbl threshold during the third quarter.

Oil Off Its Highs but Risks Return

The broader balance sheet for the oil market suggests a slight deficit in the third quarter of 2026, shifting into a surplus by the fourth quarter. By 2027, the market is expected to face a more meaningful surplus, which should lead to a long-term softening of prices—provided that demand returns and supply lines remain uninterrupted.


European Natural Gas: The Winter Vulnerability

While oil markets grapple with supply-side volatility, European natural gas prices are facing a distinct, and arguably more urgent, challenge. Following the MoU, European gas prices proved more resilient than oil, largely because the LNG supply recovery was far more modest and slower to materialize.

LNG Competition and Storage Woes

Europe is finding itself in a tightening vice. As Asian markets compete more aggressively for spot cargoes, the volume of LNG reaching European terminals has come under intense pressure. This is exacerbated by production delays in Qatar; QatarEnergy has extended its force majeure on specific supply contracts until early September, limiting the availability of new, incremental gas.

The Heatwave Effect

Adding to the supply-side stress, Europe has been gripped by persistent heatwaves. This has caused a spike in power generation needs as cooling demand surges, depleting storage levels at an inopportune time. Current EU gas storage levels have only recently eclipsed the 50% threshold, which is significantly lower than the five-year average of 66%.

Under current EU regulations, member states are mandated to meet aggressive storage targets. With the current trajectory, it appears increasingly difficult for the region to meet even the minimum 75% target before the onset of winter.

Looking Toward the 2026/27 Heating Season

There is a glimmer of hope on the horizon: El Niño conditions could potentially result in a milder-than-average start to the 26/27 heating season, which would mitigate some of the demand pressure. However, in energy markets, relying on weather patterns is a high-stakes gamble. Consequently, we expect European natural gas prices to remain heavily supported and volatile until at least the end of the winter season.


Conclusion: A Market in Flux

The global energy market is currently defined by the transition from crisis to a fragile, uncertain recovery. While the US-Iran deal provided a roadmap for supply normalization, the underlying geopolitical realities of the Persian Gulf remain as volatile as ever.

For oil, the primary question is whether the "China factor" will resolve itself through domestic policy shifts, or if the global economy is heading for a period of sustained, demand-constrained pricing. For Europe, the challenge is more immediate: a race against time and temperature to secure enough gas to survive the winter.

Investors and policymakers alike must navigate these waters with caution. The potential for a sudden, sharp price spike remains a constant risk, even as the base-case forecasts suggest a long-term trend toward lower prices. In this environment, the only certainty is that the energy markets remain hyper-sensitive to every diplomatic, military, and meteorological development.


Disclaimer: This publication has been prepared by ING solely for information purposes irrespective of a particular user’s means, financial situation or investment objectives. The information does not constitute investment recommendation, and nor is it investment, legal or tax advice or an offer or solicitation to purchase or sell any financial instrument.